U.S. Rep. Joe Sestak has been a fundraising juggernaut during his first re-election bid, collecting more than $3.6 million in campaign contributions, but it's the relatively modest amount that he's spent which is raising eyebrows.
The Edgmont Democrat has raised more money this election cycle than all but one of his fellow Pennsylvania Democratic incumbents (fellow freshman U.S. Rep. Patrick Murphy edges him by barely $90,000).
Two weeks before Election Day, however, Sestak had spent only about $880,000 in his race against Republican Craig Williams in the 7th Congressional District, according to campaign finance data. It's no paltry sum: Sestak has spent on direct-mail, some newspaper ads and building a sprawling ground-game and get-out-the-vote operation. But in the context of Congressional contests, some would call it a pittance. More telling, Sestak, as of Friday, had spent nothing on the television or radio advertisements that are a staple of most Congressional campaigns, his campaign spokesman confirmed. The decision has left the campaign with more than $3 million in the bank.
Murphy, by contrast, has spent more than $2.3 million on his race against Republican Tom Manion, showering the airwaves with TV ads. While his race was initially expected to be more competitive, it has dropped off many analysts' radar screens in recent weeks, as the economy has overtaken the Iraq war as the primary issue. It is now considered only slightly more competitive than Sestak's race, and a couple political watchers even consider it less competitive.
So why is Sestak, a former three-star admiral, spending so lightly?
Read more at Politickerpa.com >