<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://s2.wp.com/wp-content/themes/vip/newyorkobserver/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Politicker &#187; Obama Pollster Says (With Data) Ryan Pick a Dud</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicker.com/2012/08/obama-pollster-says-with-data-ryan-pick-a-dud/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicker.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 20:04:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='politicker.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://politicker.com/osd.xml" title="Politicker" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://politicker.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
				
		<title>Obama Pollster Says (With Data) Ryan Pick a Dud</title>

		<comments>http://politicker.com/2012/08/obama-pollster-says-with-data-ryan-pick-a-dud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 15:41:56 -0400</pubDate>
					<link>http://politicker.com/2012/08/obama-pollster-says-with-data-ryan-pick-a-dud/</link>
			<dc:creator>David Freedlander</dc:creator>
				
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicker.com/?p=35464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://nyopoliticker.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/gty_paul_ryan_mitt_romney_2_jt_120811_wg1.jpeg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-35467" title="gty_paul_ryan_mitt_romney_2_jt_120811_wg" src="http://nyopoliticker.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/gty_paul_ryan_mitt_romney_2_jt_120811_wg1.jpeg?w=150" alt="" width="150" height="84" /></a>The Obama campaign is out this morning with a memo from lead pollster Joel Benenson that finds--unsurprisingly, perhaps, considering the source--that the choice of Paul Ryan as Mitt Romney's running mate has been a dud.</p>
<p>The memo, titled "The Announcement without a Bounce: Romney’s Choice of Ryan Falls Flat" lays out the data.</p>
<p>Among the salient findings are that typically a veep choice gives a candidate a 4.7 percent bounce, but that according to Gallup, the choice of Mr. Ryan gained Mr. Romney only 1 percentage point. Mr. Benenson, who is based in New York, also said that veep choices count little among how voters actually vote, but that they do say something about a candidate's decision-making ability. <!--more--></p>
<p>"On this score, Romney seems to have failed a key test," Mr. Benenson writes. "Only 39% view Romney’s choice as 'excellent' or 'good,' while 42% say Ryan was an 'only fair' or 'poor' choice. These are the lowest marks since Gallup began asking the question, 5 points lower than George H.W. Bush’s choice of Dan Quayle. Meanwhile, only 48% believe Ryan is qualified to be president, also near the bottom in the past quarter century.  Only Quayle (32%) and Sarah Palin (39%) were seen as less qualified."</p>
<p>Full memo below:</p>
<div></div>
<p><strong>TO:              </strong> Interested Parties</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>FROM:</strong>         Joel Benenson</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>RE:</strong>              The Announcement without a Bounce: Romney’s Choice of Ryan Falls Flat</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>DATE:</strong>          August 16, 2012</p>
<p>Ø  Mitt Romney’s choice of Paul Ryan as the Republican vice presidential nominee is viewed less favorably and has had less positive impact than nearly any nomination in a quarter century.</p>
<p>ü  Initial metrics place Romney’s choice on a par with the selections of Sarah Palin and Dan Quayle.</p>
<p>Ø  The announcement of a nominee’s running-mate has typically led to a measurable bump for a ticket.</p>
<p>ü  Since 1996, Republicans have received an average 4.7 point gain in the polls, according to Gallup.</p>
<p>Ø  In contrast, initial polls show that Ryan has had virtually no impact on Romney’s position in the polls, even in polls that have been shown to have a Republican-leaning “house effect.”</p>
<p>ü  In Gallup’s daily tracking poll, Romney has picked up only 1 point of support since the pick.</p>
<p>ü  In Rasmussen’s daily tracker, Romney has lost a point from his pre-announcement standing, going from a 46-44 lead over the President to a 45-44 lead today.</p>
<p>ü  According to the Economist’s YouGov poll, the President has extended his lead from 46-45 in early August to 47-44 in the three days after the choice of Ryan.</p>
<p>Ø  Analysts often over-estimate the influence of a running-mate on a presidential campaign. Studies regularly show that voters base their choice on their opinions of those at the top of the tickets.</p>
<p>Ø  Where the choice of a running mate matters, though, is in what it says about the decision-making ability and priorities of the presidential nominee.</p>
<p>Ø  On this score, Romney seems to have failed a key test.</p>
<p>Ø  Only 39% view Romney’s choice as “excellent” or “good,” while 42% say Ryan was an “only fair” or “poor” choice.</p>
<p>ü  These are the lowest marks since Gallup began asking the question, 5 points lower than George H.W. Bush’s choice of Dan Quayle.</p>
<p>Ø  Meanwhile, only 48% believe Ryan is qualified to be president, also near the bottom in the past quarter century.</p>
<p>ü  Only Quayle (32%) and Sarah Palin (39%) were seen as less qualified.</p>
<p>Ø  Defenders of the Ryan selection have pointed to Ryan’s low level of familiarity as the reason for these poor ratings and the negligible effect on the race dynamic.</p>
<p>Ø  But historical data casts into doubt this analysis.</p>
<p>Ø  In its first post-pick poll, Gallup finds 39% saying they had never heard of Ryan.</p>
<p>ü  By comparison, Sarah Palin was unknown to 51%, and yet her choice was still viewed more favorably initially.</p>
<p>ü  In 1996, Jack Kemp was unknown to 55% of voters. Nonetheless, his choice led to a 9-point bump in Bob Dole’s position in the horserace against President Bill Clinton.</p>
<p>Ø  A more likely explanation is that for his running-mate, Romney has chosen a leader from the most extreme wing of the the least popular institution in America, Congressional Republicans.</p>
<p>ü  In the most recent Gallup poll, only 10% approved of the job Congress was doing, the lowest rating Gallup has ever measured for Congress.</p>
<p>ü  A recent PPP poll found that 60% agreed that “this is the worst Congress ever.”</p>
<p>Ø  In this way, the coverage of Ryan emphasizing his position as the “intellectual leader” of the Republican Congress and the author of its agenda only serves to weaken the Romney-Ryan ticket.</p>
<p>ü  Voters’ reaction to Romney’s choice of Ryan suggests a high level of concern that with his selection of running-mate, Romney has explicitly aligned himself with the leadership, the agenda and the extreme ideology of the least popular Congress in history.</p>
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://nyopoliticker.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/gty_paul_ryan_mitt_romney_2_jt_120811_wg1.jpeg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-35467" title="gty_paul_ryan_mitt_romney_2_jt_120811_wg" src="http://nyopoliticker.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/gty_paul_ryan_mitt_romney_2_jt_120811_wg1.jpeg?w=150" alt="" width="150" height="84" /></a>The Obama campaign is out this morning with a memo from lead pollster Joel Benenson that finds--unsurprisingly, perhaps, considering the source--that the choice of Paul Ryan as Mitt Romney's running mate has been a dud.</p>
<p>The memo, titled "The Announcement without a Bounce: Romney’s Choice of Ryan Falls Flat" lays out the data.</p>
<p>Among the salient findings are that typically a veep choice gives a candidate a 4.7 percent bounce, but that according to Gallup, the choice of Mr. Ryan gained Mr. Romney only 1 percentage point. Mr. Benenson, who is based in New York, also said that veep choices count little among how voters actually vote, but that they do say something about a candidate's decision-making ability. <!--more--></p>
<p>"On this score, Romney seems to have failed a key test," Mr. Benenson writes. "Only 39% view Romney’s choice as 'excellent' or 'good,' while 42% say Ryan was an 'only fair' or 'poor' choice. These are the lowest marks since Gallup began asking the question, 5 points lower than George H.W. Bush’s choice of Dan Quayle. Meanwhile, only 48% believe Ryan is qualified to be president, also near the bottom in the past quarter century.  Only Quayle (32%) and Sarah Palin (39%) were seen as less qualified."</p>
<p>Full memo below:</p>
<div></div>
<p><strong>TO:              </strong> Interested Parties</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>FROM:</strong>         Joel Benenson</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>RE:</strong>              The Announcement without a Bounce: Romney’s Choice of Ryan Falls Flat</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>DATE:</strong>          August 16, 2012</p>
<p>Ø  Mitt Romney’s choice of Paul Ryan as the Republican vice presidential nominee is viewed less favorably and has had less positive impact than nearly any nomination in a quarter century.</p>
<p>ü  Initial metrics place Romney’s choice on a par with the selections of Sarah Palin and Dan Quayle.</p>
<p>Ø  The announcement of a nominee’s running-mate has typically led to a measurable bump for a ticket.</p>
<p>ü  Since 1996, Republicans have received an average 4.7 point gain in the polls, according to Gallup.</p>
<p>Ø  In contrast, initial polls show that Ryan has had virtually no impact on Romney’s position in the polls, even in polls that have been shown to have a Republican-leaning “house effect.”</p>
<p>ü  In Gallup’s daily tracking poll, Romney has picked up only 1 point of support since the pick.</p>
<p>ü  In Rasmussen’s daily tracker, Romney has lost a point from his pre-announcement standing, going from a 46-44 lead over the President to a 45-44 lead today.</p>
<p>ü  According to the Economist’s YouGov poll, the President has extended his lead from 46-45 in early August to 47-44 in the three days after the choice of Ryan.</p>
<p>Ø  Analysts often over-estimate the influence of a running-mate on a presidential campaign. Studies regularly show that voters base their choice on their opinions of those at the top of the tickets.</p>
<p>Ø  Where the choice of a running mate matters, though, is in what it says about the decision-making ability and priorities of the presidential nominee.</p>
<p>Ø  On this score, Romney seems to have failed a key test.</p>
<p>Ø  Only 39% view Romney’s choice as “excellent” or “good,” while 42% say Ryan was an “only fair” or “poor” choice.</p>
<p>ü  These are the lowest marks since Gallup began asking the question, 5 points lower than George H.W. Bush’s choice of Dan Quayle.</p>
<p>Ø  Meanwhile, only 48% believe Ryan is qualified to be president, also near the bottom in the past quarter century.</p>
<p>ü  Only Quayle (32%) and Sarah Palin (39%) were seen as less qualified.</p>
<p>Ø  Defenders of the Ryan selection have pointed to Ryan’s low level of familiarity as the reason for these poor ratings and the negligible effect on the race dynamic.</p>
<p>Ø  But historical data casts into doubt this analysis.</p>
<p>Ø  In its first post-pick poll, Gallup finds 39% saying they had never heard of Ryan.</p>
<p>ü  By comparison, Sarah Palin was unknown to 51%, and yet her choice was still viewed more favorably initially.</p>
<p>ü  In 1996, Jack Kemp was unknown to 55% of voters. Nonetheless, his choice led to a 9-point bump in Bob Dole’s position in the horserace against President Bill Clinton.</p>
<p>Ø  A more likely explanation is that for his running-mate, Romney has chosen a leader from the most extreme wing of the the least popular institution in America, Congressional Republicans.</p>
<p>ü  In the most recent Gallup poll, only 10% approved of the job Congress was doing, the lowest rating Gallup has ever measured for Congress.</p>
<p>ü  A recent PPP poll found that 60% agreed that “this is the worst Congress ever.”</p>
<p>Ø  In this way, the coverage of Ryan emphasizing his position as the “intellectual leader” of the Republican Congress and the author of its agenda only serves to weaken the Romney-Ryan ticket.</p>
<p>ü  Voters’ reaction to Romney’s choice of Ryan suggests a high level of concern that with his selection of running-mate, Romney has explicitly aligned himself with the leadership, the agenda and the extreme ideology of the least popular Congress in history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://politicker.com/2012/08/obama-pollster-says-with-data-ryan-pick-a-dud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/9126acd84fcd0adc78145076c0706d45?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">dfreedlanderobserver</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://nyopoliticker.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/gty_paul_ryan_mitt_romney_2_jt_120811_wg1.jpeg?w=150" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">gty_paul_ryan_mitt_romney_2_jt_120811_wg</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
