Why Bob Turner Won

 Why Bob Turner WonThe finish line for political races is always the same, but the starting line is not. In the race to replace Anthony Weiner in the Congressional seat covering parts of Queens and Brooklyn, Democratic Assembly David Weprin began several paces ahead of his Republican opponent, retired businessman Bob Turner.  For one thing, Democrats outnumber Republicans three–to-one. For another, Mr. Weprin has one of the most famous names in Queens politics–his father, Saul was a former speaker of the Assembly. And finally, the machinery to win low-turnout elections–the labor unions and local political machines that actually get people to the polls–skews almost entirely to Mr. Weprin’s side.

But if the Turner race teaches us anything it is that sometimes–and it is only sometimes–structural matters are secondary, and the better campaign can actually win. And that is what happened here. Mr. Turner simply ran a campaign that outflanked Mr. Weprin at every turn. It is a banal point, but one worth remembering amidst all of the post-election chatter about Israel and Obama and machine politics, all of these only became factors once the Turner campaign made an issue of them.

To wit, consider Israel. Making this race a referendum on President Barack Obama’s Middle Eastern policy was Ed Koch’s idea,but the Turner team ran with it. It seemed absurd. Mr. Weprin is an Orthodox Jew who has family in Israel and who has visited there many times. Mr. Turner had no real ties to Israel. But within days, Mr. Weprin was on the phone, defending his allegiance to the Jewish State and was forced to explain how his vote to legalize same-sex marriage was a civil rights, and not a religious consideration.

From the start, the Weprin team ran a front-runner’s campaign, not answering Bob Turner’s attacks or coming up with their own offense. After an initial Siena poll showed Weprin with only a slight lead, the Weprin campaign vowed to toughen up their message, and they repeatedly tried to make the race about Democratic hobbyhorses–Medicaid, Social Security, the Ryan Budget. But perhaps voters were tired of it. The Turner camp threw bombs and they hit. Mr. Weprin’s long career in politics enabled Mr. Turner to tie him to every scandal that had hit the City Council or the State Assembly in the last decade–slush funds, Richard Lipsky, and the like. The Ground Zero Mosque, which didn’t help Rick Lazio back when the issue was actually on the front pages, somehow became important again. Not until August 17, after weeks of attacks, did Mr. Weprin punch back. A slight misstatement on the size of the national debt to the Daily News editorial board was ridden for days by the Turner campaign.

The closest that the Weprin team came to punching back was when Bob Turner said that he didn’t support the 9/11 health bill passed through Congress last year and meant to pay for the health care of first responders injured in the attacks. But the narrative never caught on. The tabloids, by that point, were pasting Mr. Weprin for bringing “spies” into the the Turner campaign offices or for using “scare tactics” on area seniors. By the time the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee taped an ad with a sly reference to 9/11 in it, the race was over.

If the Weprin campaign can be cut any slack, it would be because special elections are, for lack of a better word, weird. This is the fourth in little more than three years, in New York, and the previous three were all won by Democrats in seats that were as heavily tilted towards the Republicans, as this one was towards the Democrats.  It is proof that special elections are a little like the town halls that Congressmen subject themselves to during the off-season, where the only people who show up are those who are really pissed off about something and want their voices heard.




2 thoughts on “Why Bob Turner Won

  1. Tidal Wave Bob Turner won because “the gods” made it happen.

    Fron their home on Mount Olympus they threw their LIghtning rods and struck the Democ”RATS” and their union allies.

    How sweet it is

    Before there was the “Oracle at Delphi” there was Count Vampire J. Machiavelli

    VJ Machiavelli
    The Legislative Budget is Too Damn High

  2. Why don’t any of the pundits, talking heads and spin doctors mention the fact that this district had a congressman that was liked and supported by his constituents? Congressman Weiner was pushed out by the congressional leadership of his own party! When he was having what amounted to a marital problem, he was called on to resign by the House Minority Leader, Nancy Pelosi, the Chairwoman of the DNC, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, and the Chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, Steve Israel.

    It is the responsibility of these three people to obtain and hold Democratic seats in the House for the good of the Country. Why on earth these three would oust a popular Democratic Congressman is totally baffling. Why these three are still in their leadership positions is equally baffling… especially Israel, whose position as head of the DCCC has no other purpose than to fill congressional seats with Dems! It was in her first weeks as head of the DNC that Wasserman Schultz called on Congressman Weiner to resign. (Within the next few days, she also said that the Dems now “own this economy,” but that’s a whole other rant.)

    At the time of Congressman Weiner’s “issue,” polls showed that his constituents supported him. Why would the Democratic leaders push him out the door? I would not fault Congressman Weiner for resigning of his own accord, but his party’s leadership made it untenable for him to stay by joining Rush Limbaugh and other Republican leaders’ calls for his resignation.

    It really should not come as a shock that Weiner supporters would stay at home, when the Democratic leadership had already disenfranchised them by, in effect, ousting the representative they had voted for. With the “real” Democrats sitting out the election, it made it possible for special interest voters to express their will, after the will of the majority in the district had been nullified by outside forces.

    The Democratic leaders did not need to call on Congressman Weiner to resign. His personal issue was only a distraction because they allowed it to be. The appropriate response to any question about the Congressman’s issue would have been, “I am not going to comment on Congressman Weiner’s marital issues when we should be focused on putting Americans back to work and when the Republicans are planning on welching on the Country’s debts.”

    It is not because of President Obama, Ed Koch, Turner, Welprin, the economy or any other reason that the Democrats are down an additional seat in Congress. The blame should rest squarely on the shoulders of the Democratic leaders who made it impossible for the Congressman to remain in his seat.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s